Sfoglia il codice sorgente

[slam] Add support for SLAM window lengths of greater than one packet

Add the definition of SLAM_MAX_BLOCKS_PER_NACK, which is roughly
equivalent to a TCP window size; it represents the maximum number of
packets that will be requested in a single NACK.

Note that, to keep the code size down, we still limit ourselves to
requesting only a single range per NACK; if the missing-block list is
discontiguous then we may request fewer than SLAM_MAX_BLOCKS_PER_NACK
blocks.
tags/v0.9.4
Michael Brown 16 anni fa
parent
commit
c3811d4a13
1 ha cambiato i file con 30 aggiunte e 11 eliminazioni
  1. 30
    11
      src/net/udp/slam.c

+ 30
- 11
src/net/udp/slam.c Vedi File

@@ -94,12 +94,19 @@ FEATURE ( FEATURE_PROTOCOL, "SLAM", DHCP_EB_FEATURE_SLAM, 1 );
94 94
 #define SLAM_MAX_HEADER_LEN ( 7 /* transaction id */ + 7 /* total_bytes */ + \
95 95
 			      7 /* block_size */ )
96 96
 
97
+/** Maximum number of blocks to request per NACK
98
+ *
99
+ * This is a policy decision equivalent to selecting a TCP window
100
+ * size.
101
+ */
102
+#define SLAM_MAX_BLOCKS_PER_NACK 4
103
+
97 104
 /** Maximum SLAM NACK length
98 105
  *
99
- * We only ever send a NACK for a single packet.
106
+ * We only ever send a NACK for a single range of up to @c
107
+ * SLAM_MAX_BLOCKS_PER_NACK blocks.
100 108
  */
101
-#define SLAM_MAX_NACK_LEN ( 7 /* block */ + 1 /* #blocks = 1 */ + \
102
-			    1 /* NUL */ )
109
+#define SLAM_MAX_NACK_LEN ( 7 /* block */ + 7 /* #blocks */ + 1 /* NUL */ )
103 110
 
104 111
 /** SLAM slave timeout */
105 112
 #define SLAM_SLAVE_TIMEOUT ( 1 * TICKS_PER_SEC )
@@ -242,7 +249,8 @@ static int slam_put_value ( struct slam_request *slam,
242 249
  */
243 250
 static int slam_tx_nack ( struct slam_request *slam ) {
244 251
 	struct io_buffer *iobuf;
245
-	unsigned long block;
252
+	unsigned long first_block;
253
+	unsigned long num_blocks;
246 254
 	uint8_t *nul;
247 255
 	int rc;
248 256
 
@@ -263,16 +271,27 @@ static int slam_tx_nack ( struct slam_request *slam ) {
263 271
 	 * data out as fast as it can.  On a gigabit network, without
264 272
 	 * RX checksumming, this would inevitably cause packet drops.
265 273
 	 */
266
-	block = bitmap_first_gap ( &slam->bitmap );
267
-	if ( block ) {
268
-		DBGCP ( slam, "SLAM %p transmitting NACK for block %ld\n",
269
-			slam, block );
274
+	first_block = bitmap_first_gap ( &slam->bitmap );
275
+	for ( num_blocks = 1 ; ; num_blocks++ ) {
276
+		if ( num_blocks >= SLAM_MAX_BLOCKS_PER_NACK )
277
+			break;
278
+		if ( ( first_block + num_blocks ) >= slam->num_blocks )
279
+			break;
280
+		if ( bitmap_test ( &slam->bitmap,
281
+				   ( first_block + num_blocks ) ) )
282
+			break;
283
+	}
284
+	if ( first_block ) {
285
+		DBGCP ( slam, "SLAM %p transmitting NACK for blocks "
286
+			"%ld-%ld\n", slam, first_block,
287
+			( first_block + num_blocks - 1 ) );
270 288
 	} else {
271
-		DBGC ( slam, "SLAM %p transmitting initial NACK\n", slam );
289
+		DBGC ( slam, "SLAM %p transmitting initial NACK for blocks "
290
+		       "0-%ld\n", slam, ( num_blocks - 1 ) );
272 291
 	}
273
-	if ( ( rc = slam_put_value ( slam, iobuf, block ) ) != 0 )
292
+	if ( ( rc = slam_put_value ( slam, iobuf, first_block ) ) != 0 )
274 293
 		return rc;
275
-	if ( ( rc = slam_put_value ( slam, iobuf, 1 ) ) != 0 )
294
+	if ( ( rc = slam_put_value ( slam, iobuf, num_blocks ) ) != 0 )
276 295
 		return rc;
277 296
 	nul = iob_put ( iobuf, 1 );
278 297
 	*nul = 0;

Loading…
Annulla
Salva